milikeep.blogg.se

Sparx enterprise architect vs visual paradigm
Sparx enterprise architect vs visual paradigm










sparx enterprise architect vs visual paradigm
  1. #SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM SOFTWARE#
  2. #SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM CODE#
  3. #SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM PROFESSIONAL#

Tested with the wibu codemeter dongle emulator and custom licenses. I had to start using nedit under Ubuntu 18.04.5 in VirtualBox under Win 10 and unfortunately encountered an intermittent problem with the keyboard input stopping to work (see post here: ).Īfter trying to use nedit-ng for a bit I decided to switch back and try to solve that keyboard input problem. It solved the problem with the input into the edit windows, but introduced (or maybe they are unrelated) the problem with the dialog boxes. I haven’t spent much time on the dialog boxes input problem yet. So far my solution was to link nedit statically under Ubuntu 16.04 (see “static-ubuntu16″ build configuration) where it worked flawlessly and run that executables under 18.04. It appears to work, but it has been only a week or so, not enough time to confirm for sure that the dialog boxes problem is gone. The edit windows keyboard input problem though is certainly resolved now. I had to start using nedit under Ubuntu 18.04.5 in VirtualBox under Win 10. NEdit 5.7 that came with Ubuntu 18.04 and the binary that was perfectly stable under 16.04 (under ESXi) were both getting into state when the keyboard input wasn’t working (but Ctrl+ and functional keys still did). They are a drop-in replacement for “nc” and “nedit”. I actually used a small script to use symlinks for switching between the original nedit and the ng one. I just posted on another blog by this author about UML. My main evaluation factor for a tool was.

#SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM CODE#

Net code engineering, sturdy UML diagramming with good navigational capabilities such as "Jump to code/model tree/diagram/hyperlinks etc" and Undo/Redo. UModel: After evaluating several tools, I have ended up with the relatively new Altova UModel 2008. UModel integrates very well within Visual Studio, but it is a tad bit unstable at times but nothing critical.

sparx enterprise architect vs visual paradigm

I find it way better than Sparxx Enterprise Architect.

#SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM PROFESSIONAL#

These guys are constantly adding new features and offer great professional support.

#SPARX ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT VS VISUAL PARADIGM SOFTWARE#

$139 to $199ĮA: EA lacks a whole bunch of basic stuff for UML software designers but it seems to be a hit with documentation and process oriented folks who are content with abstract UML. It does not have Undo/Redo outside of the diagram pane. The UML diagrams seem to be "lightweight" almost like a drawing tool. I guess its success is largely due to it being the first affordable alternative to other overpriced (way overpriced) tools. Magicdraw: I used Magicdraw for a while and really liked it but it is pricier for C# code engineering version ($899)and a whole lot heavier on the memory. Visual Paradigm: Found Visual Paradigm a little too hyped, heavy and unstable. It had the initial wow factor but its defects became visible quite soon. Some others like Modelmaker, Metamill, Visual UML, etc.












Sparx enterprise architect vs visual paradigm